There Is No Posttraining Data Commons — and That Changes Who Controls AI

There Is No Posttraining Data Commons — and That Changes Who Controls AI

Pretraining enjoyed a vast public commons of web pages, code, and papers, but posttraining consumes tasks, not documents — and no such commons exists. Even software, the easiest case, yields tasks only through costly manufacturing: SWE-bench kept 2,294 of 90,000 pull requests, and most later audits found widespread defects. The author argues the open community must systematically inscribe human work into RL tasks before a few companies monopolize the ability to direct AI.

Pretraining consumes documents, while posttraining consumes tasks.
  1. david_shi

    What gets me excited about this project is its legibility for philanthropy, like how the Internet Archive is the destination for random recordings found in Grandma's attic.

    Having a trusted steward to handle the anonymization and eval design process could kickstart a world where retiring tax accountants, or even active and generous ones, are willing to donate their data to the posttraining commons at a scale that's actually much larger than the "data industry".

  2. dlwh

    Hi, I wrote this a few weeks ago. Didn't expect to see this here, etc., etc.

    Happy to answer any questions. We have a discord https://marin.community/

  3. mrkn1

    A very academic way of saying We have all the data in the world, except the data we actually need. You ask a company how something works and they say:

    "Oh, theres a process."

    Great. Where is it documented?

    "in a spreadsheet."

    Which spreadsheet?

    "Well, theres the old spreadsheet, new spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet that Karen maintains."

    Where's Karen?

    "She left in 2021."

More from this day

2026-11-04