Modern Pop Is Machine-Perfect Because Human Timing Gets 'Corrected'

What Is Gridifcation

Modern Pop Is Machine-Perfect Because Human Timing Gets 'Corrected'

The Musical Form Institute calls it gridification: after-the-fact quantization that snaps performed audio to a fixed grid. Tempo analysis of 1975 hits like Captain & Tennille's 'Love Will Keep Us Together' shows real human push and pull; 2025's 'Die With a Smile' shows zero tempo transitions down to a ten-thousandth of a BPM. The one exception, Shaboozey's 'A Bar Song (Tipsy),' was built around a raw voice memo. The essay argues gridification erases felt time and the artist's voice, and proposes a Certificate of Embodied Production to certify presence.

Gridification is when a human performance is treated as error in need of correction and turned into a machine-perfect representation of itself.
  1. bitsinthesky

    When I was in high school our amateur jazz band went into a recording studio to make a fun keepsake album. My memory is fairly hazy, but the whole experience was a lot of fun! Everybody got their microphones and a headset. Maybe we recorded by sections and likely with a metronome track.

    When we finished we got to go watch the sound guys at work. They meticulously gridified and autotuned every note. After it was all over I got the cd, I listened to my favorite tracks that I got to spend the semester playing with my friends, and it had no resemblance to what I knew our group to be. I think I threw the album away.

  2. tasty_freeze

    Famous studio and touring bassist Lee Sklar has a great youtube channel [1] where he tells war stories and plays along to a few of the thousands of songs he has recorded on over the past 50 years.

    In one (which I can't find) he mentions a Japanese musician coming to LA to record with the top LA studio guys. It is very common to play to a click track, and one song just wasn't gelling. The studio guys said, "Let's try it one time without the click track." The Japanese musician said, "We're allowed to do that?" Anyway, they went ahead and the song came to life. The musician literally cried after because it felt so good to not be focused on tracking the click instead of being in the moment making music with a bunch of other humans.

    [1] https://www.youtube.com/@lelandsklar6363/videos

  3. gwbas1c

    I just find a lot of modern music... boring. It feels perfect but just isn't interesting.

    In contrast, when I check out older music from less successful musicians, it's often very imperfect; both in that it's boring, but in that there's little talent there.

    Or, to translate: Gridification is modern style that doesn't make up for lack of talent; and ironically masks the talent that used to be there.

    Related: I suggest checking out some of the newer Lemon Twigs albums. They're decent songwriters and excellent musicians. They went 100% analog on their most recent album, which I initially thought was a gimmick, until I read this article.

  4. fragilerock

    I've always found stuff about how technological/sociological advances beget changes in music really interesting. David Byrne's book 'How Music Works' covers this exact point about quantisation and much more.

    I would argue that there's probably a lot more nuance here when you look at how economics of music have changed in the last 50 years - it's now so much cheaper and easier to produce and listen to music. There are millions of bedroom producers experimenting with production techniques, and the market for music is completely saturated with more good music than anyone could possible listen to. Record labels just can't compete when it comes to making interesting, creative music, however they can still win at marketing. I think the modern charts now are less determined by what resonated well with audiences, but rather what has been calculated to be the most 'marketable' kind of music, and I suppose a metronomic tempo is an easier sell in this regard.

    Also worth noting: a perfect tempo makes a song a lot easier to remix, which can often gain the song a lot more exposure than the original edit.

  5. wodenokoto

    > the kick and bass do not line up exactly. You never hear that in a contemporary pop mix anymore. That is not because musicians lost the ability to play together.

    Why would losing the ability to play together cause the kick and bass to line up? This is the most forced claudism I've seen in a long time.

  6. bix6

    > It is because modern music production now treats human temporal particularity as error in need of correction.

    I was thinking about this the other day as I was playing guitar adding slight pauses and swings to what I was playing. The imperfection makes things so much more interesting and fun imo.

  7. ilitirit

    Battery 3 from Native Instruments is a drum sampler from around 2013. This is in the manual:

    Remember, machines don’t kill music, people do—and quantization is one of the main weapons.

    ...

    Quantizing everything is the quickest way to suck the life out of a piece of music.

    https://docs.native-instruments.com/pdf-guides/Battery_3_Man...

  8. jimmis

    I remember in the late 00s when making fun of autotune was a common joke, and a way to attack "bad" or "lazy" singers / musicians. Probably just because some bands were using it stylistically (T-Pain most notoriously).

    It was around the same time there was a backlash against the (rather egregious) use of Photoshop in advertising. But for better or worse, in both cases, the use of these and similar tools have become ubiquitous, just in a way that's more subtle.

    Nowadays, hearing a band that isn't pitch corrected and quantized to all hell is refreshing, similar to seeing an actor with imperfect teeth. It feels like, for probably a whole host of reasons, almost every art form has been trending toward removing all the imperfections that make human art feel "human" and interesting. I don't expect this will get better now that we have AI.

More from this day

2026-10-22