The 'Invisible Companies' That Beat the Market Without Any Moat

The 'Invisible Companies' That Beat the Market Without Any Moat

Steve Ross built Time Warner by first rolling up mundane businesses like funeral parlors and parking lots, then trading them for a movie studio. This article explains how such companies—unknown, misunderstood, or disdained—can earn supranormal profits simply because no one pays attention to them. It explores four mechanisms of invisibility and argues that competitive neglect, not just barriers to entry, protects these firms, citing examples like Constellation Software and Waste Management.

The reward for being overlooked is, paradoxically, the opportunity for supranormal profits.
  1. PaulRobinson

    I have thought about this a lot over the years and tried to spot these companies - many of them are the type of business that Berkshire Hathaway would love to find.

    Some of them are a little more visible simply because they’ve scaled and developed a moat - logistics, particularly trucking in the UK, and international cargo shipping, stand out here for me. But also social care, floristry and grocery wholesaling, weird sectors in aviation (I worked in that for a while), all sorts.

    And then I look at family businesses that shouldn’t be able to exist all the time. In my nearest town centre there is a grocer, a fish shop and a butchers on the high street. Common sense tells us the extra large supermarket built on the outskirts of the town in the 1990s should have obliterated them, but no.

    In the UK there is a common assumption that a lot of vape shops, barbers and even some takeaways are fronts for money laundering (and that definitely happens - there is a chicken shop in one Northern town I know that to my knowledge has no ability to actually sell you chicken, nor can the 4 others next door to it). But there are definitely some that are making good money via the legal route.

    As a software guy I look for opportunities to sell to them and there’s one theme that stands out across many of them that is also an invisible sector: have you noticed how many small companies make and sell touchscreen tills/cash registers? In the UK it seems to be a thriving cottage industry.

  2. jtrn

    Here is the entire article compressed from 21k characters to 176:

    It’s easier to get away with large margins and not spawn competitors if nobody scrutinizes you, and it’s easier not to get scrutinized if you are small or the domain is boring.

    Not a knock on the article. It’s nice to double-click on a concept and explore it with examples and from many angles. But for me, it would have been easier to start with that framing, because it took way too long to understand the purpose of the article, atleast for me.

  3. Animats

    There's a whole genre of YouTube cartoon videos about this.

    Dry cleaners.[1]

    Parking lots.[2]

    7 boring businesses.[3]

    [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B0cASirKyE

    [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La4SAUvmKz4

    [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebaiF97mCtM&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D...

  4. danielmarkbruce

    If you spend any time trying to find such companies you'll see that for every invisible profitable company you'll find 20 invisible unprofitable disaster companies.

    Search funds have existed for a long time now, and it's hard work.

  5. skinfaxi

    There are many opportunities to start the your own invisible company. I once started a small business ($33k/year) that sold exactly one product to one company for a few years. One thing the article glosses over in the Steven Ross discussion is that this guy was clearly entrepreneurial: he was able to see the gaps and find or build solutions to fill them. You can in fact build a business around solving a "simple" problem for one business, and because it is a small scale you are essentially invisible to the would-be competition.

More from this day

2026-09-03