Retired professor arrested for blocking a delivery robot — and she'll do it again

Retired professor arrested for blocking delivery robot. Will do it again

Carolyn Marvin, a 78-year-old retired University of Pennsylvania professor, was handcuffed and cited for disorderly conduct after standing in front of an Uber Eats delivery robot in Philadelphia. She calls it a First Amendment protest against job displacement, sidewalk hazards, and surveillance cameras. Pennsylvania law classifies such robots as pedestrians, but Marvin insists she has more rights than a machine — and plans to keep blocking them.

I wasn’t impeding any persons. I was impeding a machine.
  1. tashian

    In the 1920s, "jay" was a slur similar to "country bumpkin" — an unsophisticated person who didn't understand the city. As cars became more common, the term "jaywalker" emerged, and the auto industry's PR arm seized on it and eventually helped it codify into law. Before jaywalking was a thing, newspapers blamed drivers for accidents, assuming people had the right to walk anywhere (as they always had) and cars needed to yield. It didn't take long for the auto industry — makers of the hottest new technology in the world — to convince their friends in the media to flip the narrative and start shaming pedestrians for getting in the way of cars.

  2. roenxi

    What this woman is allowed to do makes up a complex topic; there are arguments in all directions. But if her scheme for improving the world involves foremost delaying some people's lunch then she should put some time into coming up with a better plan. Ginning up attention by being unusually petty isn't going to be the path to world peace and prosperity.

  3. eutropia

    It sounds more like she was arrested for not following an order given by the police officer to move out of the way of the robot.

  4. ungreased0675

    I don’t want robots on the sidewalk because I guarantee they won’t move out of the way of people jogging, kids riding bikes, older people, etc. They’re moving obstacles. Delivery drones are a more respectful option, as long as they’re quiet like the Zipline ones Walmart uses.

  5. SenHeng

    The real story hidden somewhere down below

    > In the aftermath of her arrest, Marvin has found out more about the legal infrastructure that protects robots. In 2020, the Pennsylvania legislature passed a law that classifies autonomous delivery robots — what the law calls “personal delivery devices” — as pedestrians, not vehicles. Democrats, along with labor unions and accessibility advocates, largely opposed the law on the basis that legalizing delivery robots could kill jobs and endanger children and pedestrians; Republicans touted it as an exciting technological advancement.

    > The law means that a vehicle must yield to a delivery robot on crosswalks, just as it would to a person

  6. kstenerud

    There's a difference between not giving way to a robot vs spending 10-15 minutes actively blocking it.

    Yes, we're going to quickly come to a head on the issue of robots on sidewalks, much like we have with e-scooters, or Google's ill-fated bikes.

    The robots open a new possibility on an existing system (sidewalks), which is going to lead to problems from both sides until the legislature comes up with new rules. This is how free and democratic societies work.

  7. alehlopeh

    These robots are all over the place around here. They use the sidewalks, but beyond that they need space for deployment and space to wait while idle. They don’t just pop out from a little tiny door like in Star Wars.

    In my old neighborhood they had a forward operating base in an empty lot along a moderately busy street, one with plenty of foot traffic on the sidewalks. People often use the lot to play with their dogs.

    Every day a truck pulls up, taking up several public parking spots, and over the course of an hour, the driver unloads 20-30 delivery bots. Then the bots line themselves up in the grass just off the sidewalk. This acts as their home base while they wait for deliveries.

    It’s possible the operators have a deal with whoever owns the land, but it seems more like they’re opportunistically exploiting any resources they can find in order to reduce costs. Which is pretty much in line with what I’d expect from a startup.

  8. hebleb

    I work in Philly where this happened. I consider myself a pretty mild mannered person, but even I get an urge to kick these things while walking home during rush hour on busy sidewalks lol. They are mostly harmless though

More from this day

2026-10-31