Nvidia is the central bank of AI

Nvidia is the central bank of AI

Nvidia's $5.4trn market value and $1trn revenue forecast rest on more than chips. It has pledged over $70bn to startups and $300bn in customer support, backstopping data centres and guaranteeing compute prices. Critics see echoes of the dotcom bust, when Cisco and Lucent financed buyers who later collapsed. The bet assumes Nvidia chips hold value and compute demand keeps booming; neither is assured.

Nvidia is walking a fine line between 'enabling demand' and 'creating it'.
  1. JumpCrisscross

    > worth around $5.4trn

    Note that the Fed has a $6.7tn balance sheet [1]. (This is a silly comparison. But still fun.)

    The real comparison: Nvidia's $500+ billion of investments and commitments [2] is substantially more than any easing the Fed has done in the same time [3]. Monetarily, Nvidia is creating a lot of money in our economy.

    The good news: I have seen no evidence Nvidia has borrowed against its stock or otherwise linked its equity value to these commitments. Its stock could crash without causing–as long as its cash flows continue–a credit crisis through its investments and commitments.

    [1] https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttren...

    [2] https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045810/000104581026...

    [3] https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttren...

  2. manlymuppet

    I've always found it interesting when corporations start acting like public institutions. When traditionally philosophical, social contract ideas apply to things like corporate governance. Or like here, where private structures get powerful and important enough to resemble government structures.

    The ideas we deal with when we discuss society and organization aren't exclusive to government, they relate to human nature in general. I wonder if in the future we will have more discussion of power and how to organize it in corporations, similar to what we discuss today about government.

  3. anu7df

    Cracks are starting to appear. Open Ai and Anthropic are publicly asking for slowdown in AI research. Translation: We see this technology not being any more useful than what it is now, no AGI is coming, and the first one to accept this and slow down the dollar burn rate will incur the wrath of the market. So let's say this big boogey man technology will end all life on earth and we all slow down together. Bonus points if we can lobby for this to be included in the national security bucket. Then US govt can bail us out. Yay!

    If Nvidia is the bank, they should be starting to sweat a bit. It's not often companies ask for a voluntary slowdown.

  4. thrownawaysz

    I wonder when they will give up on the gaming market because that could take down several publishers and developers. I really don't think it's an if question but a when because it almost feels like an afterthought at this point (they removed the standalone gaming revenue report from the financial reports this summer). Also I don't think AMD and Intel is capable "to step in" to replace them.

  5. tolugenius

    Archive: http://archive.today/kt50V

  6. MangoCoffee

    >Nvidia’s financial engineering is partly a response to its biggest customers’ transformation into rivals. “Hyperscalers”, tech giants such as Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft, account for roughly half of Nvidia’s revenue

    Companies just don't want to pay Jensen's tax. Hyperscalers might still pay Jensen's tax for LLM training but for inference. you don't have to. they are also betting on their own chip for training to replace Nvidia.

    this is Nvidia panicking and doing vendor fiance to Neoclouds and buying Hugging Face. even none hyperscalers like Meta is betting on its own chip for AI inference.

  7. vannevar

    It would be more accurate to say Nvidia is the central bank of data center projects. The vast majority of capex associated with AI is for data centers, not the actual technology. Nvidia needs to create data center projects to sell to, hence its role in financing them.

  8. vayup

    I am a bit confused at people looking at this negatively. If Nvidia believes AI demand is extraordinarily high, and that it requires a large capital outlay to serve that capital, isn't this what they should be doing?

  9. epsteingpt

    This is a good headline and point.

    Realistically, they're worse than a central bank, because they can't exactly expand supply monotonically like a normal central bank. Nor do they realistically control rates.

  10. treebeard901

    The Japanese economy and yen carry trade is a close second.Rising oul prices and reduced output due to the conflicts in the Middle East could filter through to increasing yields on Japanese debt. In turn, the yen interventions have to continue to keep it lower than 160, which seems to be the psychological barrier for the yen carry trade.

More from this day

2026-09-12