The Death of Shame Is Tearing Us Apart

The Death of Shame Is Tearing Us Apart

In his Fault Lines column, Jay Caspian Kang argues that people are increasingly abandoning social norms in favor of narrow self-interest, and that the consequences are disastrous. Drawing on everyday examples, he traces how the decline of shame reshapes public life and deepens the divisions between us.

Increasingly, people are ignoring social norms in favor of a narrow self-interest. The results are disastrous.
  1. shib71

    Shame was more effective in the past is because it came with consequences - lost business, lower standing in the community, fewer romantic prospects. It used to be part a healthy survival instinct. Without repercussions, shame is just a handicap and those who don't have it have a massive advantage.

  2. Fr0styMatt88

    I think it was Dr K of Healtgygamer that explained it something like non-toxic shame is a useful signal — “I did something wrong and this is a signal telling me so; I need to correct my behaviour” vs toxic shame as in “I am fundamentally a bad/worthless person”. We kinda got the two tangled together and in trying to reduce the second, we probably demonised the first a bit too much.

    Could be remembering wrong though.

  3. zetanor

    Strange that this short article mostly focuses on the absence of shame in business and politics, which has been a constant for many times my lifetime. And we should blame social media for this, too? The only difference now is that everyone knows about backroom dealing. If the author didn't conspicuously omit the absence of shame in journalism, I feel like he'd be a step closer to an interesting observation.

  4. dguest

    Football / Soccer had "flopping" [1], which anyone who watched it in the early 2000s would recognize: every foul was accompanied by a "victim" writhing on the field in agony, in excess of anything you'd see in much more violent sports.

    Apparently it's diminished a bit in recent years, but not because it's clearly shameful behavior: the leagues started issuing bans.

    [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_(association_football)

  5. plantain

    Sit on public transport and listen to everyone playing music / watching tiktok without headphones. Shame is dead.

  6. trescenzi

    I recently heard the term _vice signaling_ and it’s very appropriate for this era. While in the past virtue signaling would be used to identify yourself as the member of an ingroup. It’s now common to signal that by doing things that would previously, and by many still are, considered beyond the pale.

  7. dguest

    > Evil genius is just a lack of shame.

    -- Cory Doctorow

    https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2026-04-11...

  8. roenxi

    There seems to be a bit of a gap vis a vis solutions in the article - someone could set the system up so it doesn't incentivise tanking. The punishment for tanking should be that the teams performed poorly for no compensation. It's all very well to set up a system to encourage poor behaviour then shame the people who behave rationally. But it is much more sustainable in the long term to make good behaviour also strategically optimal.

    > Post-Hinkie, the league experimented with variations of the lottery, but none of them could deter teams from losing on purpose.

    I struggle to believe they've tried everything unless they're also talking about players betting against themselves (which probably is impossible to overcome without bans). Incentives aren't easy things but there has to be some system where winning > losing.

    On that topic we're actually pretty lucky - in the real world, the winning strategy over long time-frames is almost always talking, prosperity and cooperation. Not obvious why the powers that be are so keen to involve other strategies that routinely deliver worse material and moral results.

More from this day

2026-09-11