SpaceX Stock Erases Gains and Slides Below IPO Price in Intraday Trading

SpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading

SpaceX Stock Erases Gains and Slides Below IPO Price in Intraday Trading

SpaceX shares dipped below their $135 IPO price for the first time, wiping out early gains and signaling fading hype around Elon Musk's company. Despite the historic $86 billion raise and aggressive AI expansion plans, investor concerns over spending and debt are mounting. The stock briefly recovered to close just above the offering price, but upcoming employee lockup expirations could trigger further volatility.

SpaceX shares dipped below their IPO price of $135 on Wednesday morning for the first time since listing, signaling dwindling hype around the Elon Musk company.
  1. ornornor

    “Shocking nobody” I would add… This is an obvious Musk scam and anyone with financial knowledge called it as such ever since it’s been on the table. Why else lobby and change the NASDAQ listing rules for instance?

  2. paoliniluis

    The IPO was meant for the VCs to cash out as all fundamentals were completely irrational, but seems like no one cares about cash flow and profitability anymore during QE times. Dumb money will keep being dumb I guess

  3. petilon

    SpaceX, despite its name is an AI company, supposedly. Its S-1 states that the company estimates its total addressable market (TAM) at $28.5 trillion, of which $26.5 trillion, or 92.98%, is expected to come from AI.

    SpaceX is an AI company without a frontier model. Until Jan 2026 SpaceX was an aerospace company. Then xAI was merged into SpaceX on January 30, 2026, so SpaceX became an AI company less than 6 months ago.

  4. MinimalAction

    As a scientific adventure, SpaceX is a worthy company full of awesome people. But the management and VCs is another story, as usual. To price it at a market cap of $1.8T, somewhere double that of Walmart is insane.

  5. pfisherman

    My understanding is that an ideally priced IPO should not move much from the opening price in the near term. If it pops it means they left money on the table. If it drops, then I am not sure what the implication is exactly?

    Now I think SpaceX is massively overhyped, but is the share price returning to IPO opening not just a sign that the banks accurately estimated something?

  6. cmiles8

    There’s still really nothing keeping it at even these lower levels except pure hype. By the fundamentals typically applied to aggressive growth companies a “sane” price is closer to $40-60 and even that would be very aggressive considering the company’s financials.

    If the company doesn’t quickly show a financial picture that matches the sky high pro formas then even anything close to those levels will become extremely hard to justify.

    The bond markets have already turned very negative on SpaceX with extreme red flags developing there.

  7. small_model

    Anyone buying IPO for short term gain would have exited at initial spike, others (like me got in at allocation price) will be holding for a decade or two so this is noise, expected not sure why it posted here, do we post every tech stock intra day price move

  8. abtinf

    I’m way out of my depth in suggesting this idea, so forgive me if I’m committing a conceptual “divide by zero” and it’s not even wrong:

    It seems like the SpaceX IPO really breaks the traditional notion of market cap.

    Market cap has an unstated assumption that most of a company’s stock could, in theory, be traded unencumbered. Thus shares * price gives a very rough view of the value of the company. Everyone understands that this valuation has problems: it attributes the last marginal trade to the entire stock, and doesn’t account for large purchases/sales. But it’s useful nonetheless.

    But with SpaxeX, only a tiny fraction of those shares are even theoretically tradeable, so it seems bizarre to calculate valuation using price * shares. I think this is the source of discomfort around the $2T market cap.

    It seems like, similar to how there are long and short term liabilities, there should be long and short term market caps.

    “Short term market cap” would be price * “number of shares that could theoretically be available for trade within the next year”, from all sources (including vesting employee options, expiring lockups, etc).

    “Long term market cap” would be price * total authorized shares.

    So SpaceX’s long term market cap would remain at $2T and its short term market cap would be, say, 5% of that (about $100B).

More from this day

2026-07-16