OpenAI's super PAC is funding an AI-generated news site that attacks industry critics

OpenAI's super PAC is funding AI-generated news site attacking industry critics

OpenAI's super PAC is funding an AI-generated news site that attacks industry critics

An investigation reveals that Acutus, a news site launched in December 2025, is almost entirely AI-generated, with 69% of its articles flagged as fully AI-generated and only 3 of 94 as human-authored. The site's operators left code exposing an AI-driven editorial pipeline, including an 'AI interviewer' that emails real people for quotes. Evidence links the site to Republican PR firm Novus Public Affairs, whose president, Patrick Hynes, appears as a quoted source. OpenAI's super PAC is reportedly funding the site to advance its political agenda.

Michael Chen, it turns out, almost certainly isn’t a real reporter. And Acutus, it turns out, almost certainly doesn’t have any real reporters at all.
  1. narrator

    Meanwhile, the AI critics got an enormous war chest thanks to Vitalic giving them all his dog coins as a joke that ended up being worth almost a billion to fight against AI.

    https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/03/14/vitalik-buterin-...

  2. iammrpayments

    Probably doing something similar here.

    This place average post went from “look at this new javascript framework” to “I just became 100x more productive with AI” in the last 3 years

  3. Alien1Being

    Perfectly rational.

    Unleash bots and sock puppets, generate mindless hype.

    Add a bit of circular accounting.

    Watch the investments roll in and the share price soar up.

    Profit...

  4. Alien1Being

    Fraud, but a presidential pardon has already been paid for in advance.

  5. JumpCrisscross

    Is there a state in which this constitutes fraud?

  6. protocolture

    >But there don’t seem to be any contributors, or at least not human ones. I ran every article on the site through Pangram (the AI detector that credibly claims a near-zero false-positive rate). Of the 94 articles, 69% came back flagged as fully AI-generated, with another 28% flagged as partially AI-generated. Only three articles were classified as human-authored.

    How credible is this credible claim?

  7. 0xDEAFBEAD

    Funny, I was told by HN commenters that worries about AI risk are just a clever marketing strategy on the part of OpenAI and friends. I wonder why they would be working so hard to push back?

  8. jms703

    This is normal tech company marketing strategy, right?

More from this day

2026-08-03