A Simple Proof of the Sylvester–Gallai Theorem

A Simple Proof of the Sylvester–Gallai Theorem

The Sylvester–Gallai theorem states that any finite set of points in the Euclidean plane, not all collinear, has a line passing through exactly two of them. This article presents a concise proof by mathematician Leroy Milton Kelly, using the concept of a point-line pair with minimal distance. Assuming a line contains more than two points leads to a contradiction via similar triangles, proving the theorem elegantly.

If we draw a connecting line 𝓂 that passes through P and C, and draw the perpendicular from B to B′ on 𝓂, then BB′ will be shorter than PP′ (because PP′C and BB′C are similar triangles).
  1. hyperhello

    > Every finite set of points in the Euclidean plane that is not collinear has a line that passes through exactly two of the points.

    I can't make out the point here (no pun). Of course a line can pass through any two points. It could pass through three if those points were collinear but the statement says they're not. So what is the new fact?

  2. pratikdeoghare

    > According to a strengthening of the theorem, every finite point set (not all on one line) has at least a linear number of ordinary lines. An algorithm can find an ordinary line in a set of n points in time O(n log n). [1]

    There are many such lines (think convex hull) and they are easy to find.

    This makes it hard to appreciate the theorem.

    You keep thinking oh whats the big deal.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester%E2%80%93Gallai_theor...

  3. frotaur

    In the proof, it claims that "At least two of these must fall on the same side of P′, the perpendicular projection of P on ℓ.".

    However, this is not true as it is possible that P'=B. However it seems the proof still goes through (at least as depicted in the image, haven't thought hard about the general case).

  4. Nail2680

    I might be too stupid to understand why this is interesting and useful. If it helps I am a working physicist, and a lot of pure math is lost on me. I think I followed this, but I don't know why one would care or this would be interesting.

  5. emil-lp

    Futility closet is fantastic!

More from this day

2026-08-07