Google Expands Age Signals API for Safer Android Experiences Worldwide

Google will expand age checks on Android worldwide till the end of the year

Google Expands Age Signals API for Safer Android Experiences Worldwide

I am announcing the global expansion of the Google Play Age Signals API to empower developers and parents. This privacy-preserving tool allows users to share age ranges directly with apps, enabling tailored safety experiences without complex settings. Starting in Australia and Canada, this initiative will roll out worldwide by year-end, giving families centralized control through the Google Family Link app while allowing developers to customize content based on audience age.

Rather than enforcing one-size-fits-all rules, we give developers the flexibility to choose how they integrate safety signals.
  1. RandomGerm4n

    I'm fundamentally opposed to age verification because it usually leads to mandatory account creation no matter how privacy friendly the age verification process itself may be. It's already extremely annoying that, for example, on YouTube, you can no longer watch many videos without an account. Furthermore, the whole thing also reinforces monopolies. Once you've verified your age on one platform, the barrier to switching to another is even higher than before.

    The only acceptable solution would be for apps and websites to simply include a recommended age. Allowing parents to configure their children’s devices to block services that require users to be older than the specified age or that do not provide an age rating. Once this were established, websites targeting all age groups would have a strong incentive to participate. Otherwise, they would suddenly become invisible to a large portion of their underage users.

  2. iamflimflam1

    I find myself stuck on the fence with age checks.

    Companies have show that they are incapable or unwilling to address the problems they cause. And market forces are not working to correct things. It’s also pretty obvious that saying “parent should take responsibility” is also not working. Just observe the world around you to know it’s a non starter.

    This is where regulation is supposed to come in.

    At the same time, companies have shown that they will abuse any personal information that is shared with them and we are now giving them more details about ourselves…

  3. random_ind_dude

    I think it's the old that need to be protected more on the Internet since they disproportionately fall prey to online scams. So let's age-gate their access to online services too. If you are old and want to send money to someone, you get age-gating and second-factor authorization from a competent young person. If you want to watch porn online, believe it or not, age-gating and second-factor authorization.

  4. xinayder

    Can't we build a gateway in the internet that detects if someone is a influential CEO or something and just bar access to the internet?

  5. Ajedi32

    Well, the API itself seems fairly well designed from a privacy perspective. It only shares age ranges, not specific ages, and only if you allow it. The data is also fuzzed to prevent an app from determining your exact birth date, and it's all tied in to the parental control system.[1]

    The problem remains though that, since the laws this feature was created to comply with put the onus on Google to verify the user's age and not on the device owner (e.g. the parents), the method they use to determine the user's age to feed into this API is terrible from both a privacy and freedom perspective: they force you to send them a copy of your government ID, and delete your account if you don't comply.[3]

    [1]: https://support.google.com/googleplay/answer/17232873

    [2]: https://developer.android.com/google/play/age-signals/unders...

    [3]: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1333913

  6. mmis1000

    I doubt the purpose is even age verification. They already can know I have a visa card which is credit card that can be only applied by an adult by looking at the BIN. Why they need my id card if the purpose is actually age verification?

  7. sunaookami

    This coordinated worldwide effort at the same time is very creepy.

  8. neilv

    > The Play Age Signals API is a privacy-preserving tool that puts parents in the driver's seat allowing them to share their child's age range (e.g. 16-17) directly with apps.

    Sounds like an adtech targeting demographic, not protecting children.

  9. _davide_

    Seriously ready to fully drop google emails and services, i'm using vivaldi + personal email for a while now, the migration was slow a bit painful but complete.

    Only the phone is still attached to play store and google, but i'm 100% ready to switch to the fully supported Chinese variant of ColorOS and flush Google into the toilet once and for all. But my next phone will 100% be a Sailfish again.

  10. potato-peeler

    > in our ongoing partnership with parents and developers by announcing the expansion of the Google Play Age Signals API

    Which parents and which developers? How many of them? From where?

More from this day

2026-07-30