Unions Can Save Tech Workers and Tech Work

Unions Can Save Tech Workers and Tech Work

Two University of California tech workers discuss their unionization drive, the largest in US tech history, and how unions can help recapture the original promise of technology serving people rather than enriching the worst people in the world.

Unionization gave us a way to say: this is a widely unpopular way of dealing with our livelihoods.
  1. jamestimmins

    As a California tech worker (where the article is focused), I have zero interest in joining a union and firmly believe that much of what has been possible as a tech employee (high paying, interesting career) is in part because we don't have unions, and instead employees own equity and get valuable skills.

    Modern tech workers arguably have the best career deal in the history of humankind. I see no upside in killing the goose with the golden egg.

  2. hylaride

    This is essentially a story about front-line traditional desktop support/sysadmins at a public university.

    It's not going to be the same story at much higher paid shops where workers often have equity, good benefits, and the market has provided access to other jobs if you lose yours (in my experience, there are still shortages of qualified and competent engineers).

    I would like a different method to deal with the pitfalls, but the politics, drama, overhead, and costs of unionization just don't interest me. I'm not interested in being at one job for life.

  3. Plasmoid

    My ask for these is always the same. I just want to see how this union would work, specifically.

    Don't compare it to other unions or say it could be like X. Just write a few hundred words on what it would actually be like.

  4. lispwitch

    I'm involved in a new workers cooperative, and I've been thinking about how organizational structures relate to the workplace. Cooperatives are fantastic, where they exist. In the tech world, two prominent examples are Igalia and Bocoup. (I worked on SpiderMonkey at Igalia, and collaborated with Bocoup on test262 tests.) Both are highly specialized consultancies, and both are internally democratic. To get some idea of what it's like to work at a coop, I recommend the 2023 FOSSY talk "Inside Igalia: Scaling a Co-Op Beyond 100 Members": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=du7fC8VCbXg

    Workers coops have structural limitations, though: with some exceptions, they're new entrants to the market and have limited access to capital. Unions interact with existing businesses, which I think is why they're so much more controversial than coops, and they can bring some of the benefits of workplace democracy to a much larger group of people than coops presently can.

  5. pewpewlaser

    Was part of the frontline effort to get our colleagues into UPTE. As we move towards AI automation, we need to make sure that workers have a seat at the table when we impact our students, patients, and our research across the state.

  6. newsomix9xl

    The title should be "Good unions can save ..."

    Bad unions cannot. All unions are not the same.

    Doctors have a super powerful lobby and union (not sullied with the plebian name "union") and lo! Are super wealthy.

    They have mandatory laws restricting competition and licensing requirements, etc.

    If tech workers had a lobby like the AMA and doctors, they too would be super rich.

    Golf, anyone?

  7. teravor

    the problem with unions is that they tend to enjoy legal protections not afforded to anyone else. as such they will distort the marketplace. as is often the case with such carve-outs those who can get in early tend to benefit at the expense of everyone else.

    it was a mistake to entrench unions because now you will never get rid of them, but it's not surprising as the alternative would have been aggressive anti-trust action and the corporate powers would much rather deal with unions (whose incentives they can model just as well as their own).

    note that the incentives of the unions are the incentives of the union organizers which much like in democracy are not aligned with the collective they purport to represent.

  8. Animats

    That is a public-sector union. That's different. Political power matters in that space.

    A useful private sector union to watch is The Animation Guild, IATSE local 639.[1]

    They represent traditional animators in Hollywood - Disney, Dreamworks, Marvel, etc. But they've never been able to organize a game company, despite years of trying. They have good contract terms - the contract is a floor on wages, not a ceiling, and overtime is handled well.

    Here's what purports to be a complete list of "tech unions" in the US.[2] Only six have a contract with the employer. That's pathetic. The six:

    - "Apple Shuttle Drivers Union". Not even Apple employees, but drivers for Compass Transportation. Teamsters.

    - "Gimlet Union". Gimlet Media employees. Writers Guild of America. 83 people.

    - "Glitch Union". Glitch platform defunct as of 2025. Communications Workers of America.

    - "Ringer Union". Affiliated with Spotify. Writers Guild of America. 65 people.

    - "Security Guards at Silicon Valley" Service Employees International Union. 3000 people.

    - "United HCL Workers of Pittsburgh". Google contractor. 20th largest H1-B visa sponsor in US.

    "HCL America INC has filed 60,667 H1B applications and 1,294 PERM green card petitions. Avg salary: $102,175." Steelworkers Union. 60 people.

    Only the last represents "tech workers", and that company is mostly non US citizens.

    Anyone know of other unions which, right now, contractually represent tech workers in the US?

    Just not finding any real tech worker unioni […]

More from this day

2026-08-07