Why Checking for Human Writing Is Daft: Judgment Over Typing

The whole premise of checking for human writing is daft

I argue that demanding proof of manual typing is a flawed test of humanity that confuses labor with intelligence. True authorship lies in intention, judgment, and responsibility, not in the physical movement of fingers. By focusing on the process rather than the outcome, we exclude people with disabilities and ignore how tools like AI have always expanded human capability. We should assess whether someone understands and defends their ideas, not whether they typed every word themselves.